- #A MAC IS BETTER THAN WINDOWS FOR MAC#
- #A MAC IS BETTER THAN WINDOWS PATCH#
- #A MAC IS BETTER THAN WINDOWS WINDOWS 10#
- #A MAC IS BETTER THAN WINDOWS SOFTWARE#
- #A MAC IS BETTER THAN WINDOWS MAC#
#A MAC IS BETTER THAN WINDOWS MAC#
Smaller organizations can use the $20 OS X Server to do the same, as well as manage network backups via central Time Machine servers.īecause few IT pros I talk to are aware of this, you should know that Macs have full-disk encryption that you can manage through policies, controls over admin privileges, password-required login, lock a Mac's bootup to a specific drive (that requires hands-on setup at the Mac itself, though).Using a mobile device management (MDM) server you likely already have, such as those from MobileIron and VMware's AirWatch unit, for iPhones and iPads you can manage Macs' security and configuration remotely, based on Active Directory groups.
As of OS X Lion and moreso OS X Mountain Lion, Apple made most of its iOS management and security APIs available to OS X.There are also System Center add-ons to extend Mac management capabilities, such as from Centrify. Microsoft's System Center supports Macs running OS X Yosemite if running a Microsoft configuration client.The more Windows-like your management approach, the more it will cost to manage your Macs. The good news is that you can manage Macs for the same or lower cost, depending on the approach you take. Gartner estimates that IT organizations spend $2,000 to $2,300 per user per year to manage and secure their Windows PCs. Windows has lots of security and management APIs, of course, which let IT go to town in securing and managing them using tools like System Center - at a huge cost.
#A MAC IS BETTER THAN WINDOWS PATCH#
It still shocks me how much time and money IT organizations spend on securing Windows PCs, such as for incessant antivirus updates and frequent infection-cleanup efforts, for managing backups and encryption, and for dealing with dozens of often problematic fixes every month in the infamous Patch Tuesday releases. (I hear similar stats from CIOs I meet at conferences, though so few companies use Macs to any scale that all I can offer are such anecdotes, rather than statistical "proof.") The Mac aids your security and recovery needs For example, Cisco Systems, once adamantly an anti-Mac company, now has about 20 percent of its users on Macs ( that's 35,000 Macs), a feat that turned out to be easily accomplished and did not increase IT resource needs.
#A MAC IS BETTER THAN WINDOWS SOFTWARE#
Why? Because having a certain percentage of non-Windows users provides a fail-over capability in case of a malware or hacking meltdown, as well as lets some users work with devices they are more comfortable with.Ī good metric is that about 15 to 25 percent of employees should be using a Mac, with the higher percentage aimed at companies that focus on software and creative work. "Regular" office workers should be given a choice as to whether to use Windows or OS X, if their job requirements are satisfied by either platform. Why? Because Macs are better suited to thwarting phishing and other attacks on these sensitive users' systems and for operating outside your network.
#A MAC IS BETTER THAN WINDOWS FOR MAC#
The bottom line: Executives and road warriors are the best candidates for Mac use in a company, in addition to the historic Mac enclaves of application development and creative functions such as marketing and design.
#A MAC IS BETTER THAN WINDOWS WINDOWS 10#
That wasn't my intent, but those comments made me think about where the Mac fits in the enterprise and what causes so many IT organizations to be so emotionally opposed to having non-Windows PCs in their companies. When I said last week that Windows 10 won't save the PC, some Windows-addled IT folks said I was secretly suggesting that enterprises replace their PCs with Macs.